• Lisa Seaman (lseaman@digipix.com)
  This particular morsel arrived about 3 days after the NIC registration took effect for peta.org, and this web page wasn't even up yet.

• Doug & Michelle (102125.3720@compuserve.com)
  

• MATT J WALLACE (MNMG81C@prodigy.com)
  A Prodigy user. Need I say more?
  Yes. I should mention that the name of the disease is spelled multiple sclerosis and its cause is not known to be related to the eating of meat.

• Derek Dolan (hsd@minerva.athenet.net)
  When all else fails, complain that authorities should intervene and impose regulations.

• DAMOSF@aol.com
  My response: "No, it's amazing how little time it takes to annoy lots and lots of people."

• Anonymous
  But it isn't hard to figure out who the real sender is from the headers.

• MATT J WALLACE (MNMG81C@prodigy.com)
  As if once was not enough...

• miranda (miranda@Mankato.MSUS.EDU)
  

• XdowncastX@aol.com
  

• LdyTeresa@aol.com
  

• Jonathan Spence(jonathan.spence@utoronto.ca)
  If he was really paying attention, he would have noticed by now the "blatantly obvious" fact that disregard for the welfare of animals is a distinguishing feature of many animal rights advocates. Note also his disdain for the "upperclass," as if the wearing of fur or the wearing of leather may be morally differentiated by the background of the individual doing the wearing.

• AnEman@aol.com
  Here's another Sensitive New Age Guy who seems to think that a threat based on the "law of karma" would get my attention. The only attention I give it is to note that such threats ("cause an accident") are often carried out by human hands.

• Jennifer Ayla Jay <jenny@MIT.EDU>
  No one has had their access to any other source of information obstructed by the existence of this site, or by its domain name. And as for "disrespectful," perhaps you should be reminded that certain animal-rights organizations are "disrespectful" of my right to eat what I want, wear what I choose, and engage in legal outdoor activities like fishing, for instance. Their "disrespect" is expressed in much more direct ways than a few words on a web page.

• David Choweller <davec@cs.UCR.EDU>
  Yet another invitation to enjoy a horrible death. (Yawn.)

• Tomlin, Robert C. <atomlin@cybersol.com>
  Me? Afraid of diversity? You've gotta be kidding. Of course, this guy is in great company, following in the "they must be afraid of us" style of PeTA spokesdroid Steven Ragland. More whining about a lack of "respect," too. See above. I'm also quite flattered to be consistently referred to in the plural.

• AntiChr604@aol.com
  

• Doug Cowan <cowan@sirius.com>
  I get called "low" in the tradition of PeTA spokesdroid Steven Ragland, along with the use of the "Big Business" and "White Male" scapegoats, whining about a non-existent threat to free speech posed by my page, and Lots of Unnecessary Capitalization. There's that plural reference again!

  You'd think guys like this would eventually catch on to the fact that they're being cynically manipulated by appeals to their anxieties about class, race, wealth, and the environment, with a helping of anthropomorphism from early exposure to Saturday morning cartoons, and demands for purity which stem from our all-pervasive Judeo-Christian tradition. But I guess you can't expect too much when engaging people who, in the words of a poster to talk.politics.animals, are like "arguing with a rock."

• Andrew Mansfield <amansfield@omm.com>
  You'd think it would be obvious by now that anyone can put up a web page with a few minutes of effort, and not the least bit "exhausting." I always politely decline offers of prayer...

• Jordan Webster <jwebster@ilcc.cc.ia.us>
  Followers of cult leaders are often quick to assume that their critics are antisocial, broken, or sick in some way. Apparently the same may be true of at least one the followers of the animal rights movement.

• Bradley280@aol.com
  Short, foul and to the point.

• James Carlson <carlson@xylogics.com>
  These four letters are four letters and do not, in and of themselves, constitute an "identity." And as usual, anything said about me, my habits or my political leanings in response to this web site is probably false.

• (female name withheld) 6th grade vegetarian
  
• (male name withheld) (AGE 12)
  Two casualties of the animal-rights movement's attempt to target children. Sad.

• Farouk Dindar <fdindar@ibm.net>
  

• The Max <max-mail@pi.net>
  These demands that I die are getting rather redundant...

• Alicia Innes <jkinnes@ix.netcom.com>
  Poor Jeff.

• Charles Behrens <charlie@aimtech.com>
  You really have to wonder sometimes if these people are even capable of laughing at a joke. You'd think that laughing and enjoing life would be too "immature" for them.

• Rob Turk <rturk@austin.ibm.com>
  Oh-oh. Mail from Austin, home of some of the most anal-retentive males on the planet. And you can be damned sure they weren't born in Texas. Would you like a hyphen with that gardenburger? ("Food for people" in anything resembling a civilized society is impossible without "profit." Think about it.)

• Richard Wilson's wife <not_you_me@msn.com>
  Interesting how many husbands are having their names attached to their wife's ravings. Are you guys just too cheap to buy your wives their own online account, or what?

• bblock@atlantic.net
  Yet another demonstration that lots of education doesn't necessarily stimulate critical thinking, skeptical thought, common sense, or awareness that one's ethical or eating preferences shouldn't necessarily be forced down the throats of the rest of the citizenry.

• ZKotnik@aol.com
  I find the implied equivalence made between animals, "nonwhites" and "nonmales" in this message incredibly repugnant. Obviously the writer has no clue as to why that would be so.

• alisong@nicom.com
  Whoever said I was fighting "animal rights?" They don't exist, so fighting them would be rather difficult.

• RaccoonDW@aol.com
  Again, assumptions made about my personal habits, preferences, or level of armament are very likely incorrect.

• Jon Marburger <earwig@grove.ufl.EDU>
  So, fill me in, somebody - what is the connection between one's personal choice to live a 'vegan' or carnivorous lifestyle, and the Republican party? Beats me. It must have something to do with this widespread delusion that eating is an act of political expression.

• Joyce King <joy@net66.com>
  That someone would be so deluded to think that 'violence and hostility are slowly becoming history' is in itself rather depressing. There's that attempt to equal women and minorities with animals again, coming from a woman. Ironic, isn't it?

• Anonymous
  As a colleague recently pointed out to me, anyone completely without enemies possibly hasn't lived a full life. A few hundred indignant and upset fanatics out of hundreds of thousands of readers of my various websites don't bother me in the least.

• Diane Louik <udi@starnetinc.com>
  

• gomes2@wit.edu
  Perhaps this writer should start by considering the value of an occasional paragraph break. Then he might want to consider who's following who.

Back to the People Eating Tasty Animals home page